IDA
IDA-PTW EEWS Review Tinjauan IDA-PTW EEWS Java-Sunda · R² = 0.7091 · Task 15 Final Jawa-Sunda · R² = 0,7091 · Task 15 Final

IDA-PTW EEWS — Operational Framework Portal

IDA-PTW EEWS — Portal Framework Operasional

A 4-stage on-site Earthquake Early Warning System for the Indonesian Java-Sunda Subduction Zone, delivering real-time spectral acceleration prediction across 103 structural periods. Status: Task 15 final — ready for IEEE Access submission.

Sistem Peringatan Dini Gempa on-site 4-tahap untuk Zona Subduksi Jawa-Sunda Indonesia, memberikan prediksi spektral akselerasi real-time pada 103 periode struktural. Status: Task 15 final — siap untuk submission IEEE Access.

Composite R²Composite R² 0.7091 (oracle UB 0.7779) 0,7091 (oracle UB 0,7779) Stage-1 AccuracyAkurasi Stage-1 79.64% / 81.68% balanced 79,64% / 81,68% balanced DatasetDataset 25,058 (Stage 0) / 23,537 (Stages 1-2) 25.058 (Stage 0) / 23.537 (Stages 1-2) UpdatedDiperbarui 2026-04-24
TL;DR — Ringkas — The IDA-PTW operational framework achieves composite R² = 0.7091 across 103 spectral periods (oracle upper bound 0.7779) on 23,537 Indonesian accelerograms under event-grouped 5-fold CV. Stage 0 URPD (AUC = 0.9136) shrinks the near-field blind zone from 38 km to 11 km (Balanced, 100% Damaging Recall) / 4 km (Aggressive). Stage 1 achieves 79.64% overall / 81.68% balanced accuracy on an MMI-hybrid 3-class discretisation via XGBoost + LightGBM soft-voting ensemble with SMOTE and Optuna tuning. The 90-feature input set integrates rosers_ptw3 + prior site + Dai multi-window + frequency-domain features. 99.44% Golden Time Compliance. Retrospective validation on Cianjur 2022 & Sumedang 2024 yields 100% Stage-0 Damaging Recall. Submission-ready for IEEE Access. Framework operasional IDA-PTW mencapai composite R² = 0,7091 pada 103 periode spektral (oracle upper bound 0,7779) di 23.537 accelerogram Indonesia di bawah event-grouped 5-fold CV. Stage 0 URPD (AUC = 0,9136) mengurangi near-field blind zone dari 38 km menjadi 11 km (Balanced, 100% Damaging Recall) / 4 km (Aggressive). Stage 1 mencapai 79,64% overall / 81,68% balanced accuracy pada diskretisasi 3-kelas MMI-hybrid via ensemble soft-voting XGBoost + LightGBM dengan SMOTE dan tuning Optuna. Input set 90-fitur mengintegrasikan rosers_ptw3 + site prior + Dai multi-window + fitur frequency-domain. 99,44% Golden Time Compliance. Validasi retrospektif pada Cianjur 2022 & Sumedang 2024 menghasilkan 100% Damaging Recall di Stage-0. Siap submission ke IEEE Access.

Headline Performance (Task 15 Final)

Performa Utama (Task 15 Final)

MetricMetrik ValueNilai RelevanceRelevansi
Composite R² (103 periods, marginalised) Composite R² (103 periode, marginalised) 0.70910,7091 Headline operational metric Metrik operasional utama
Oracle upper bound (Stage-1 perfect) Oracle upper bound (Stage-1 sempurna) 0.77790,7779 Stage-2 capacity ceiling Plafon kapasitas Stage-2
Stage-1 OOF balanced accuracy Balanced accuracy OOF Stage-1 81.68%81,68% Safety-relevant (minority Damaging class) Relevan keselamatan (kelas Damaging minoritas)
Stage-0 URPD AUC (0.5 s window) AUC URPD Stage-0 (window 0,5 s) 0.91360,9136 Sub-second near-field alert Alert near-field sub-detik
Blind zone reduction Reduksi blind zone 38 → 11 km38 → 11 km −71% with 100% Damaging Recall −71% dengan 100% Damaging Recall
Golden Time Compliance Golden Time Compliance 99.44%99,44% Traces with latency budget ≤ P-S Trace dengan budget latensi ≤ P-S

View full Task 15 final results →

Lihat hasil lengkap Task 15 final →

Pipeline Optimisation Journey

Perjalanan Optimisasi Pipeline

StageTahap Method AddedMetode Ditambah Δ
task 11task 11 Class-conditional marginalisation baseline Baseline class-conditional marginalisation 0.6074
task 12task 12 + Site features (VS30, log-distance) + Fitur site (VS30, log-distance) 0.6641+0.057
task 14task 14 + Dai multi-window (2, 5, 10 s post-P) + Dai multi-window (2, 5, 10 s pasca-P) 0.6966+0.033
task 15task 15 + XGB+LGB ensemble, SMOTE, Optuna, freq features + ensemble XGB+LGB, SMOTE, Optuna, fitur freq 0.7091+0.013

Total improvement: +0.102 across four feature-engineering generations under identical GroupKFold 5-fold CV protocol (seed 42).

Total peningkatan: +0,102 dalam empat generasi feature-engineering dengan protokol CV GroupKFold 5-fold identik (seed 42).

Site Sections

Seksi Situs

★ Primary · Task 15 Final

Final Operational Results

Hasil Operasional Final

Full Task 15 breakdown: composite R² = 0.7091 headline, 90-feature architecture, 4-stage pipeline summary, and retrospective event validation. The authoritative result page.

Rincian lengkap Task 15: composite R² = 0,7091, arsitektur 90-fitur, ringkasan pipeline 4-stage, dan validasi retrospektif event. Halaman hasil otoritatif.

View final results →
Lihat hasil final →
01 · Historical

CSV Cross-check (historical)

Cross-check CSV (historis)

Original audit identifying three mixed model runs in legacy reports/. Superseded by task 15's authoritative CSVs in reports/performance/ida_ptw_task15.*.

Audit awal mengidentifikasi tiga run model tercampur di reports/ legacy. Digantikan oleh CSV otoritatif task 15 di reports/performance/ida_ptw_task15.*.

Open report →
Buka laporan →
02 · Historical

Manuscript Audit (historical)

Audit Manuskrip (historis)

Original audit of manuscript_draft_IEEE.md. The current submission-ready version is manuscript_draft_IEEE_v2.md with integrated task-15 numbers.

Audit awal manuscript_draft_IEEE.md. Versi siap-submit saat ini adalah manuscript_draft_IEEE_v2.md dengan angka task-15 terintegrasi.

Open audit →
Buka audit →
03 · Reference

Evidence A–D Appendix

Lampiran Evidence A–D

One-page English appendix: Fixed-vs-IDA benchmark, information ceiling, saturation test, P-arrival sensitivity.

Lampiran satu halaman berbahasa Inggris: benchmark Fixed-vs-IDA, information ceiling, saturation test, sensitivitas P-arrival.

View →
Lihat →
04 · Figure

Multi-panel Figure

Figur Multi-panel

4-panel publication-ready: R² vs Period, anchor bar chart, residual distribution, gap-to-ceiling decomposition.

4-panel siap publikasi: R² vs Periode, bar chart anchor, distribusi residual, dekomposisi gap-to-ceiling.

View figure →
Lihat figur →
05 · Historical

Publication Readiness (historical)

Kesiapan Publikasi (historis)

Original Go/No-Go scorecard (April 2026). Status has since progressed through task 12 → 14 → 15; current state: ready for IEEE Access submission.

Scorecard Go/No-Go awal (April 2026). Status sejak itu berkembang melalui task 12 → 14 → 15; status saat ini: siap submission IEEE Access.

Open scorecard →
Buka scorecard →
06 · Reference

SIG-BMKG Analysis (ref)

Analisis SIG-BMKG (ref)

SIG-BMKG intensity thresholds grounded in Wald 1999, Worden 2012, Caprio 2015. Motivated the MMI-hybrid (<2 / 2–50 / ≥50 gal) boundary used by Stage 1 ensemble.

Threshold intensitas SIG-BMKG berlandaskan Wald 1999, Worden 2012, Caprio 2015. Memotivasi boundary MMI-hybrid (<2 / 2–50 / ≥50 gal) yang digunakan ensemble Stage 1.

Open →
Buka →

Authors

Penulis

  1. Hanif Andi NugrahaDepartment of Physics, Universitas Indonesia, Depok. Corresponding author. ORCID: 0009-0007-9975-1566. Departemen Fisika, Universitas Indonesia, Depok. Penulis koresponden. ORCID: 0009-0007-9975-1566.
  2. Dede DjuhanaDepartment of Physics, Universitas Indonesia, Depok / BMKG, Jakarta. ORCID: 0000-0002-2025-0782. Departemen Fisika, Universitas Indonesia, Depok / BMKG, Jakarta. ORCID: 0000-0002-2025-0782.
  3. Adhi Harmoko SaputroDepartment of Physics, Universitas Indonesia, Depok. ORCID: 0000-0001-6651-0669. Departemen Fisika, Universitas Indonesia, Depok. ORCID: 0000-0001-6651-0669.
  4. Sigit Pramono — BMKG, Jakarta. ORCID: 0009-0000-5684-282X.

Manuscript target: IEEE Access (Q1). Reproducibility package: review_bundle.zip scheduled for Zenodo DOI archival. Updated 2026-04-24 with Task 15 final results.

Target manuskrip: IEEE Access (Q1). Paket reproducibility: review_bundle.zip dijadwalkan archival DOI Zenodo. Diperbarui 24-04-2026 dengan hasil akhir Task 15.