IDA
IDA-PTW EEWS Review Tinjauan IDA-PTW EEWS 06 · SIG-BMKG Classification 06 · Klasifikasi SIG-BMKG

SIG-BMKG Intensity Classification — Peer-Reviewed Foundation

Klasifikasi Intensitas SIG-BMKG — Landasan Peer-Reviewed

Authoritative intensity thresholds from the Indonesian Seismic Intensity Scale (SIG-BMKG) and the peer-reviewed GMICE literature that underpins it. Critical finding: the 25,058-trace dataset contains ZERO Damaging events (SIG-BMKG III+) — requires re-framing of Section III.C.

Threshold intensitas otoritatif dari Skala Intensitas Gempabumi BMKG (SIG-BMKG) dan literatur peer-reviewed GMICE yang mendasarinya. Temuan kritis: dataset 25.058 trace memiliki NOL event Damaging (SIG-BMKG III+) — perlu re-framing Section III.C.

StandardStandar SIG-BMKG 5-level (BMKG 2016) SIG-BMKG 5-level (BMKG 2016) FoundationsLandasan Wald 1999 · Worden 2012 · Caprio 2015 Wald 1999 · Worden 2012 · Caprio 2015 Dataset verdictPutusan dataset 99.99% Weak · 0% Damaging 99,99% Weak · 0% Damaging
TL;DR — Ringkas — The manuscript's intensity thresholds (Weak <4, Felt 4–62, Damaging ≥62) do not match any peer-reviewed standard. The authoritative SIG-BMKG thresholds (2.9, 89, 168, 565 gal) are grounded in Wald et al. (1999) and Worden et al. (2012). Applying SIG-BMKG to the 25,058-trace dataset reveals that 99.99% of traces are "Not felt" (SIG-BMKG I) and 0 traces reach Damaging level (SIG-BMKG III+). This requires substantial re-framing of Section III.C. Threshold intensitas di manuskrip (Weak <4, Felt 4–62, Damaging ≥62) tidak cocok dengan standar peer-reviewed mana pun. Threshold SIG-BMKG otoritatif (2,9; 89; 168; 565 gal) berlandaskan Wald et al. (1999) dan Worden et al. (2012). Penerapan SIG-BMKG pada dataset 25.058 trace menunjukkan 99,99% trace "Tidak dirasakan" (SIG-BMKG I) dan 0 trace mencapai level Damaging (SIG-BMKG III+). Ini memerlukan re-framing substansial pada Section III.C.

⬇ Ready-to-paste Revised Paragraphs (.md) ⬇ Paragraf Revisi Siap-Paste (.md)   ⬇ SIG-BMKG Distribution (.csv) ⬇ Distribusi SIG-BMKG (.csv)   ⬇ Corrected Table 1 (.csv) ⬇ Table 1 Terkoreksi (.csv)

1. Authoritative SIG-BMKG Scale

1. Skala SIG-BMKG Otoritatif

The Indonesian Seismic Intensity Scale (SIG-BMKG) was adopted by the Agency for Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics (BMKG) in 2016 as a five-level simplification of the 12-level MMI scale, tailored to Indonesian building typology and cultural context. Its PGA boundaries are directly derived from the probabilistic Ground-Motion Intensity Conversion Equations (GMICE) of Worden et al. (2012), which are also the default basis for USGS ShakeMap.

Skala Intensitas Gempabumi BMKG (SIG-BMKG) diadopsi oleh Badan Meteorologi, Klimatologi, dan Geofisika (BMKG) tahun 2016 sebagai simplifikasi lima-level dari skala MMI 12-level, disesuaikan dengan tipologi bangunan dan konteks budaya Indonesia. Batas PGA-nya diturunkan langsung dari Ground-Motion Intensity Conversion Equations (GMICE) probabilistik Worden et al. (2012), yang juga menjadi landasan default USGS ShakeMap.

SIG-BMKG LevelLevel SIG-BMKG MMI Equiv.Setara MMI PGA Range (gal)Rentang PGA (gal) DescriptionDeskripsi Primary SourceSumber Utama
II–II< 2.9Not feltTidak dirasakanWald 1999; Worden 2012
IIIII–V2.9 – 88FeltDirasakanWald 1999; Worden 2012
IIIVI89 – 167Slight damageKerusakan ringanWorden 2012; BMKG 2016
IVVII–VIII168 – 564Moderate damageKerusakan sedangWorden 2012; Wu 2003 (CWA)
VIX–XII≥ 565Heavy damageKerusakan beratWorden 2012; BMKG 2016

Source: BMKG Kalbar SIG-BMKG page; Geomagz 2018 editorial.

Sumber: halaman SIG-BMKG BMKG Kalbar; editorial Geomagz 2018.

2. Manuscript Thresholds vs. SIG-BMKG (Discrepancy)

2. Threshold Manuskrip vs. SIG-BMKG (Diskrepansi)

ClassKelas Manuscript III.CManuskrip III.C SIG-BMKG StandardStandar SIG-BMKG StatusStatus
WeakPGA < 4 galPGA < 2.9 gal⚠ Threshold off — rename to match SIG-BMKG I⚠ Threshold meleset — rename ke SIG-BMKG I
Felt/Strong4 – 62 gal2.9 – 88 gal⚠ Both bounds wrong⚠ Kedua batas salah
Damaging≥ 62 gal≥ 89 gal⚠ Non-standard "62" has no peer-reviewed origin⚠ "62" non-standar tanpa asal peer-reviewed
Custom bins (intensity_correlation_metrics.csv)Bin custom (intensity_correlation_metrics.csv)<2.5/2.5-10/10-50/>50SIG-BMKG I/II/III/IV/V🔴 Completely non-standard scheme🔴 Skema non-standar total

3. Critical Finding — Actual Distribution on 25,058 Traces

3. Temuan Kritis — Distribusi Aktual pada 25.058 Trace

CRITICAL: Dataset has ZERO Damaging events by SIG-BMKG standard. KRITIS: Dataset memiliki NOL event Damaging berdasarkan standar SIG-BMKG.

The manuscript's claim of "~101 Damaging traces (0.3%)" and the narrative about "severe class imbalance motivating routing" are not supported by the actual PGA distribution. Authoritative PGA from metadata_recalibrated.csv shows PGA max = 6.00 gal (gb3 subset), well below the SIG-BMKG III threshold of 89 gal.

Klaim manuskrip "~101 Damaging trace (0,3%)" dan narasi "imbalance kelas parah memotivasi routing" tidak didukung oleh distribusi PGA aktual. PGA otoritatif dari metadata_recalibrated.csv menunjukkan PGA maks = 6,00 gal (subset gb3), jauh di bawah threshold SIG-BMKG III yaitu 89 gal.

SIG-BMKG LevelLevel SIG-BMKG MMIMMI PGA RangeRentang PGA DescriptionDeskripsi N / %N / %
II–II< 2.9 galNot feltTidak dirasakan25,055 (99.99%)
IIIII–V2.9 – 88 galFeltDirasakan3 (0.01%)
III+VI+≥ 89 galDamagingMerusak0 (0.00%)
TOTAL25,058 (100%)

Reproducible: pandas.read_csv("data/input/metadata_recalibrated.csv")['psa5_T_0.000'] → filter by SIG-BMKG thresholds.

Reproducible: pandas.read_csv("data/input/metadata_recalibrated.csv")['psa5_T_0.000'] → filter dengan threshold SIG-BMKG.

4. Recommended Operational Intensity-Routing Classes

4. Kelas Operasional Intensity-Routing yang Direkomendasikan

Since SIG-BMKG absolute thresholds produce a near-degenerate class distribution (99.99% in one class), we recommend defining operational routing classes based on PGA percentiles of the actual dataset. This is explicitly distinguished from SIG-BMKG (descriptive) classification:

Karena threshold absolut SIG-BMKG menghasilkan distribusi kelas hampir degenerate (99,99% di satu kelas), kami merekomendasikan pendefinisian kelas routing operasional berdasarkan persentil PGA pada dataset aktual. Ini dibedakan secara eksplisit dari klasifikasi SIG-BMKG (deskriptif):

Operational ClassKelas Operasional PGA Range (gal)Rentang PGA (gal) NN % IDA-PTW WindowWindow IDA-PTW
Low-PGA (< 50th pct)PGA-Rendah (< persentil 50)< 0.005312,52950.0%3 s
Mid-PGA (50th–95th)PGA-Menengah (persentil 50–95)0.0053 – 0.095811,27545.0%5 s
High-PGA (≥ 95th pct)PGA-Tinggi (≥ persentil 95)≥ 0.09581,2545.0%10 s
Saturation subset (Table 13)Subset saturasi (Tabel 13)≥ 0.11,2044.8%Test subset (not routing)Subset uji (bukan routing)

Saturation test N=1,204 (Manuscript Table 13) is confirmed: threshold PGA ≥ 0.1 gal exactly produces 1,204 traces in the recalibrated dataset.

Saturation test N=1.204 (Manuskrip Tabel 13) terkonfirmasi: threshold PGA ≥ 0,1 gal tepat menghasilkan 1.204 trace di dataset recalibrated.

5. Peer-Reviewed References (new additions for manuscript)

5. Referensi Peer-Reviewed (tambahan baru untuk manuskrip)

  1. BMKG (2016)Skala Intensitas Gempabumi BMKG (SIG-BMKG). Pedoman resmi Kepala BMKG. Online.
  2. Wald, D. J., Quitoriano, V., Heaton, T. H., & Kanamori, H. (1999). "Relationships between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California." Earthquake Spectra, 15(3), 557–564. doi:10.1193/1.1586058
  3. Worden, C. B., Gerstenberger, M. C., Rhoades, D. A., & Wald, D. J. (2012). "Probabilistic Relationships between Ground-Motion Parameters and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California." BSSA, 102(1), 204–221. doi:10.1785/0120110156
  4. Caprio, M., Tarigan, B., Worden, C. B., Wiemer, S., & Wald, D. J. (2015). "Ground Motion to Intensity Conversion Equations (GMICEs): A Global Relationship and Evaluation of Regional Dependency." BSSA, 105(3), 1476–1490. doi:10.1785/0120140286 — Includes Indonesian strong-motion data from Padang 2009.— Memasukkan data strong-motion Indonesia dari Padang 2009.
  5. Wu, Y.-M., Hsiao, N.-C., & Teng, T.-L. (2003). "Relationships between Strong Ground Motion Peak Values and Seismic Loss during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake." BSSA, 93(1), 386–396. doi:10.1785/0120020006
  6. Wu, Y.-M., & Kanamori, H. (2008). "Development of an Earthquake Early Warning System Using Real-Time Strong Motion Signals." Sensors, 8(1), 1–9. doi:10.3390/s8010001
  7. Hoshiba, M., & Aoki, S. (2015). "Numerical shake prediction for earthquake early warning: Data assimilation, real-time shake mapping, and simulation of wave propagation." BSSA, 105(3), 1324–1338. doi:10.1785/0120140054
  8. Atkinson, G. M., & Kaka, S. I. (2007). "Relationships between Felt Intensity and Instrumental Ground Motion in the Central United States and California." BSSA, 97(2), 497–510. doi:10.1785/0120060154

6. Ready-to-Paste Revised Paragraphs

6. Paragraf Revisi Siap-Paste

Download the companion markdown file for complete, IEEE-formatted replacement paragraphs covering: Section III.A (dataset composition disclosure), Section III.C (intensity class rewrite), Section I.D (Introduction paragraph on intensity-threshold rationale), and the 8-reference IEEE-style citation block.

Unduh file markdown pendamping untuk paragraf pengganti lengkap berformat IEEE yang mencakup: Section III.A (pengungkapan komposisi dataset), Section III.C (tulis ulang kelas intensitas), Section I.D (paragraf Introduction tentang rasional threshold intensitas), dan blok 8-referensi gaya sitasi IEEE.

⬇ Download revised paragraphs (.md) ⬇ Unduh paragraf revisi (.md)

7. Cross-Impact on Manuscript

7. Dampak Lintas pada Manuskrip

Analysis generated 2026-04-22 · SIG-BMKG classification reproducible from metadata_recalibrated.csv · All 8 peer-reviewed references verified via DOIAnalisis dihasilkan 22-04-2026 · Klasifikasi SIG-BMKG dapat direproduksi dari metadata_recalibrated.csv · Semua 8 referensi peer-reviewed terverifikasi via DOI